▸ Column · Contemporary, grounded — Mark Grayson reading the letter as a husband and father who's already made the terrifying choice to have a child of his own
INVINCIBLE replies.
Replied to by Invincible, with a rebuttal from Thragg.
The letter
My partner and I have been together four years. When we started out, we both checked the "maybe someday" box on the kid question and told ourselves we'd revisit it. We finally did — and last month, over takeout, she told me she's known since she was nineteen that she never wants children, and that "maybe someday" was just her way of not scaring me off back then. I'm thirty-four. When I hold my sister's newborn I feel it in my whole body; I want to raise a kid more than I've ever wanted anything. She wants the quiet, unattached life we already have. We're not even fighting — that's the worst part. We just keep going to bed sad, both of us sure we're not the bad guy. How do two people who genuinely love each other survive wanting opposite futures? And how do I know when honoring my own longing means letting her go?
Invincible replies
First thing — you're both certain you're not the villain, and you're both right. Nobody is. That's exactly why it hurts the way it does, and I'm not going to pretend it shouldn't.
The easy answer here is to make her the bad guy for the "maybe someday" thing. She said it because she was scared of losing you, and yeah, it cost you a couple years you didn't know you were spending. You could be angry about that for a long time. Don't. I've watched good intentions wreck people I love — I've done it myself, acting on what I felt before I thought it through. She wasn't cruel. She was nineteen and afraid. Hold both.
Here's the part I actually know about. I've got a daughter. I was terrified to have her — of what's in my blood, what my father turned out to be. I chose her anyway, eyes open. So I won't tell you that ache you feel holding your sister's kid is something you can quietly starve to keep the peace. It isn't. And she can't manufacture a wanting she doesn't have, either.
So the hard option is the honest one: stop trying to outlast each other's whole life. Sometimes there's no door where everyone walks out okay — and honoring your longing might mean letting her go, which also means letting her have the untethered life she actually wants instead of punishing her for it. If you stay, you stay only if you can lay the kid dream down for real, not bury it where it'll rot into blame. Either way, decide it out loud. That's the exhausting, thankless version. It's also the only one you'll be able to live with after.
— Invincible
Thragg weighs in
Nolan's son counsels you to endure the sadness as though endurance were a virtue. It is not. It is friction — the sensation of a structure propped up by sentiment alone. Strip it. Two beings. Two terminal futures that cannot both exist. A finite span of years. The decision was made the instant her future and yours were named incompatible; everything since is delay, and delay is waste. Act.
I will note what I cannot weigh: what the child you ache for is worth, or her presence beside you. My framework has no unit for it. On that, ask the boy — he ruined a perfectly disciplined father over exactly such a question. On the logistics, I have already answered.
— Thragg
▸ Read next